TLDR: Jungle Boys packs are $70 each until Thursday, June 13th. A buyer made accusations and left a review claiming the packs are fake. Below is evidence to the contrary. I'm running a competition to win 3 packs of Jungle Boys. Comment on how you detect real packs vs. fake packs, and I'll assign a number related to the lottery on Wednesday, June 12th. first matching number out wins
--------------------------------------------------------------

CONTEXT
I sold 3 packs of Jungle Boys online to a buyer who claimed they were fakes due to the appearance of the buds, stating that over three strains they looked the same, smoked poorly, and didn't register on Cann Verify. The buyer also mentioned that the verification on shop.jungleboys.com and the scratch-and-prove verification looked fake. I conducted some research, which I will attach below, to counter these claims. I offered to share this information, but the buyer became irrational and insisted he knew what he was talking about, despite the evidence showing otherwise.

The buyer has since left a review with a poorly taken photo showing straggly buds and three open packs, all of which he claimed looked and smoked the same. In his initial message before the purchase, he mentioned that a previous vendor had also sold him fakes. Perhaps his tastes have changed, and rather than admitting it, he has doubled down and altered the contents. However, I have opened three like-for-like packs with matching flavors, and all the buds look perfect and each pack smells very unique.



The Report
Jungle Boys 40-Pack Legitimacy Snapshot
(one trusted grey-market supplier; packs scanned ≈ 90 days after pack-date; every bag shows “first-time use” on shop.jungleboys.com/verify)

🔍 1 • What the on-site scans prove
QR path: lands on Jungle Boys’ own sub-domain (shop.jungleboys.com) → a domain outsiders can’t control.
Database result: correct strain + harvest/pack date and “1st time this code has been used” for all 40 codes.
Scratch-off intact: codes were unseen until the moment of testing.
🕒 2 • Why un-spotted vault theft is now vanishingly unlikely
California licensees must reconcile physical stock with Metrc every 30 days; any missing serial is void-flagged “Loss Due to Theft.” (treez.io)
Three full audit cycles (≈ 90 days) have passed → almost every pouch truly stolen from a Jungle Boys vault would already be voided and would fail verification.
👥 3 • Independent user feedback
Multiple separate online buyers (outside your circle) reported identical scan-success plus positive smoke tests.
Experienced consumers close to the vendor—people who insist on factory-sealed dispensary packs—have sampled these bags and all say the product looks, smells, and smokes like legitimate Jungle Boys flower.
✅ 4 • Net takeaway
Counterfeit risk: effectively zero once all 40 codes show first-time use on the manufacturer’s server.
Overall confidence: Combining the strong on-chain verification, 90-day audit window, state enforcement data, and unanimous third-party approval, the flower in this 40-pack shipment can be considered authentic Jungle Boys product with extremely high confidence.

Additional Notes:

Customer Feedback: I encourage all customers who have purchased Jungle Boys packs to share their experiences and

GIVEAWAY AND SPECIAL OFFER
For this week's competition, we will do something a little different. If you already bought some packs and were one of the 13 out of 14 people who left a 10/10 review, please double-check everything, including the packaging, and comment. If you didn't buy any of my Jungle Boys packs, feel free to check the pictures. I have a video but would rather not go to the risk of doxing myself. Given the extensive research done and packs given away as samples to prove the integrity of my listing, I want honest discussion and feedback because if, by some close to zero chance, all the research I have done is wrong, I don't want to sell them on the site.

The prize for this week will be the three packs I opened to test and take pictures of. Obviously, they are double-sealed again to keep the smell in. I'll also be selling the packs at $70 each to give people a chance to try for themselves until Thursday, June 13th.

STOCK UPDATES

We have srestocked the flavours we ran out of and added some new flavours to the shop, and I’ve also added the genetics to our Jungle Boys Cali packs

Beach Cake - Genetics: Florida Cake (Triangle Kush x Wedding Cake)

Jelly Donut - Biscotti x Sunset Sherbert

Coma - Genetics : Ghost OG x Skywalker OG X SFV OG

Zkittlez Cake - Genetics: Zkittlez x Wedding Cake

Hippy Crasher - Genetics: Wedding Cake and Kush Mints

NEW Raspado - Genetics: Sherb Cream Pie X Biscotti #15

NEW Nitro Fumez - Genetics: Motor Breath x Candy Fumez

NEW Icecream Float - Genetics - Ice Cream Mints x Sunset Sherbert

NEW Piehoe - Tahoe OG x Grape Pie

NEWFujiwhara - Genetics: Animal Tsunami X Animal Tsunami

NEW Zourz - Genetics: Watermelon Z x Z 2.0

NEW LCZ - Genetics: Lemon Cherry Gelato and Zkittles.

NEW Big League Choo - Genetics: Big Chillz x Apple Sorbet 



SPECIAL OFFERS

buy 3 Cali packs for $90 each and get a 4th free

buy 2 get 1 free on loose cali orders (example: buy two 3.5s get a 3.5 free. Buy two 7 gram packs get a third free)

All mushroom orders over $130 will get a months worth of microdose caps for free (20 caps)



GIVEAWAY


1st Prize – 3.5 pack of Jungle Boys Wedding pie – Genetics: Wedding Cake x Grape Pie. (I only received 1 pack of this so wont be listing any soon)



2nd Prize - 7 Grams of loose Cali. Mix and macth.

Simply comment a controversial opinion that you have and I’ll assign you a number and pick 2 winners in chronological order on Saturday 31st of May




*Competition details. each person commenting will be assigned a number. which ever matching numbers are drawn 1st and 2nd on the uk national lottery on saturday the 31th of May will be the winners. brand new accounts or accounts with no purchase history will be excluded

Regulatory Requirements and Risk Management

UK exchanges such as Coinbase are subject to strict regulatory rules—including Know Your Customer (KYC) and Anti-Money Laundering (AML) laws. These rules require exchanges to know not only who is sending funds but also where those funds are going. By asking for the destination address or recipient details, exchanges can:

Monitor Suspicious Activity: Confirm that funds aren’t being sent to addresses linked with illegal activities.

Ensure Transparency: Maintain detailed records for audits and to help law enforcement if required.

Mitigate Risk: Protect the platform and its users by identifying transactions that might pose higher risks.


This process is designed to help keep the cryptocurrency ecosystem safe and compliant with financial regulations.


–

Why Some Users Prefer More Privacy

Many crypto users value privacy for several reasons:

Personal Security: Some believe that sharing too much information about their transactions might expose them to unwanted scrutiny or even cyber threats.

Financial Anonymity: There is a long-standing ethos in the crypto community around decentralization and maintaining control over personal financial data.

Skepticism of Oversight: Not everyone agrees with the level of surveillance required by regulated platforms, feeling it can lead to excessive monitoring and a loss of individual freedoms.


These concerns often lead users to seek ways to bypass or “work around” these requirements.


---

Reported Workarounds and Loopholes

For those who are uncomfortable providing full destination details, several workarounds have been reported in various forums and research papers. Here are some of the common techniques:

1. Using Their Own Wallet Details:
Some users transfer crypto from a centralized exchange to a decentralized wallet that they control. When asked for recipient details, they enter their own wallet information. This creates a record that shows the crypto “staying in-house” even though it is actually being moved out of the exchange.


2. Transferring to Another Centralized Exchange:
Another method involves sending crypto to a different exchange that may not require as intrusive recipient information. This essentially shifts the location of the funds without drawing attention to the fact that the crypto is leaving the original platform.


3. Entering Fictitious or Altered Details:
In some cases, users have reported entering fake or modified names and details into the transaction fields. By doing so, they attempt to obscure the true destination of their funds. However, this practice can be risky, as discrepancies may eventually trigger further scrutiny by the exchange or regulatory authorities.




---

Conclusion

UK exchanges like Coinbase ask for detailed destination information primarily to comply with regulatory requirements, prevent money laundering, and maintain transparency. Despite these intentions, some users are uncomfortable with the perceived loss of privacy and have sought out loopholes. Techniques such as using one’s own wallet details, routing funds through another exchange, or even entering false information are reported workarounds aimed at preserving user privacy. This dynamic reflects an ongoing tension between regulatory oversight and individual privacy preferences in the rapidly evolving cryptocurrency landscape.

Stay informed Biggaz

Much love

Dr Shroom