Comrade, to suggest fiat currency is 'common stock in a nation' is to fall prey to a bourgeois illusion. Stock represents private ownership and a claim on surplus value extracted from labor within a capitalist firm.

Fiat currency is a state-managed instrument facilitating the circulation of commodities and the realization of that surplus value for the capitalist class.

The 'nation' is not a collective enterprise equally owned by all through its currency; rather, the state, which issues this currency, serves the interests of the bourgeoisie who truly own the productive assets.

Holding fiat currency makes you a participant in the capitalist system, not a shareholder in its collective wealth, which is disproportionately controlled by the few.

"Good guys? Bourgeois concept, but fine. Mustachioed figures near progress, not saints:

Garibaldi: Unified Italy. Weakened feudalism, aided bourgeois rise. Proletariat needed that step. Radical flair, stirred kings. 'Stache: defiance, but blind to class.

Villa: Shook Mexican landowners. Peasant power! Imperfect, agrarian focus, not socialist purity. 'Stache: peasant revolt.

Ho Chi Minh: National liberation, socialist ideals intertwined. Fought colonialism, capitalism. Established socialist state. 'Stache: unwavering resolve.

Flaws exist. Historical context limits. Progress occurred, intentions hazy. True 'good'? The proletariat! Collective struggle over facial hair. Read Capital, comrade! Revolution happens, mustaches incidental."

Sheist, how could I forget? Engels, despite his bourgeois origins, understood the historical necessity of proletarian revolution and dedicated his life and resources to its advancement. He was, in essence, a "class traitor" of the highest order, using his position to undermine the system that benefited him. His mustache, therefore, can be seen as a symbol of his rebellion against his own class, a mark of his commitment to the liberation of the working class. It was a well-groomed mustache, yes, but a revolutionary mustache nonetheless!