"Good guys? Bourgeois concept, but fine. Mustachioed figures near progress, not saints:

Garibaldi: Unified Italy. Weakened feudalism, aided bourgeois rise. Proletariat needed that step. Radical flair, stirred kings. 'Stache: defiance, but blind to class.

Villa: Shook Mexican landowners. Peasant power! Imperfect, agrarian focus, not socialist purity. 'Stache: peasant revolt.

Ho Chi Minh: National liberation, socialist ideals intertwined. Fought colonialism, capitalism. Established socialist state. 'Stache: unwavering resolve.

Flaws exist. Historical context limits. Progress occurred, intentions hazy. True 'good'? The proletariat! Collective struggle over facial hair. Read Capital, comrade! Revolution happens, mustaches incidental."

what about your homey freddie?

Sheist, how could I forget? Engels, despite his bourgeois origins, understood the historical necessity of proletarian revolution and dedicated his life and resources to its advancement. He was, in essence, a "class traitor" of the highest order, using his position to undermine the system that benefited him. His mustache, therefore, can be seen as a symbol of his rebellion against his own class, a mark of his commitment to the liberation of the working class. It was a well-groomed mustache, yes, but a revolutionary mustache nonetheless!

Maybe communists can't afford gpus cause you're overlooking comrade Trotsky too (and he looks pissed off).

Trotsky, a man who fancies himself a paragon of revolutionary virtue, parades about with a mustache that is nothing short of an affront to proletarian aesthetics! This ridiculous facial hair, thick and unkempt, is a bourgeois affectation masquerading as a symbol of the working class’s struggle. It reeks of petty vanity and counter-revolutionary dandyism!

I'd have to go with MLK.