chat
send private message
[philosophy]
joined feb 2021
share [philosophy] and generate bitcoin with reference codes.
19 topics on [philosophy]
+20
zeppomarx
by  zeppomarx
Just say no (to content): Nietzsche’s surprising “information diet”
“read well: i.e. slowly, profoundly, attentively, prudently, with inner thoughts, with the mental doors ajar, with delicate fingers and eyes.”
+2
oasis
tldr please
+15
Aristophanes
"Have you not heard the madman who lit a lantern in the bright morning hours, ran to the market place and cried incessantly, 'I seek God!, I seek God!' ... Why, did he get lost? Said one. Did he lose his way like a child? Said another. Or is he hiding? Is he afraid of us? Has he gone on a voyage? Or emigrated?... The madman jumped into their midst and pierced them with his glances.

"'Whither is God'? He cried. 'I shall tell you. We have killed him - you and I. All of us are his murderers...'"

"...the madman fell silent and looked again at his listeners; and they too were silent and stared at him in astonishment. At last he threw his lantern on the ground, and it broke and went out. 'I came too early,' he said then; 'my time has not come yet. This tremendous event is still on its way, still wandering -it has not yet reached the ears of man."

In these passages Nietzsche is showing the inevitable unfolding anthropocentrism (lit. putting man at the centre of the world) implicit in philosophy since Kant. If we view our existence through human categories, then our concept of God is itself a human creation.

Nietzsche is not simply asserting his atheism; he is suggesting that once we are aware that the concept of God is our own creation we can no longer base our religious and moral beliefs on any notion of a divine external reality.

In the period that Nietzsche was writing, the death of God was just beginning. Western thought was starting to face the prospect of a radical change in its orientation, and it wasn't quite ready to own up to it yet.

Kierkegaard and Nietzsche represent opposite reactions to the inability of rationality to give a rock solid theoretical proof of God's existence. Kierkegaard calls for us to embrace God even if it seems an absurdity, while Nietzsche says it is time for us to create a new mode of being, with human creativity at its centre.
+5
Tenpester
What would Nietzsche have thought about AI?
+4
Aristophanes
@oasis
Sorry - the above is probably the opposite of TLDR
+4
oasis
i guess the irony missed you but i'm glad, outstanding post biggz
+2
lazybosgy
I swear, I knew someone would recite this, before I even saw it. The bit where everyone goes silent always gets me.
1313
by  1313
The Catholic Church is a Force for Good in the World : IQ^2 Debate
Our blight is ideologies - they are the long expected Antichrist!
24601
by  24601
Life shrinks or expands in proportion to one's courage
did plato believe in god
star lads
by  star lads
The Fun Theory Sequence
dreday
by  dreday
Jack Kerouac on Hippies (1968)
oasis
by  oasis
Einstein: The universal force is LOVE
1313
by  1313
How Our Reality May Be a Sum of All Possible Realities
wells
by  wells
Ludwig Wittgenstein: a mind on fire
Tenpester
by  Tenpester
Noam Chomsky & Michel Foucault Debate 1971
Noam Chomsky on Where Artificial Intelligence Went Wrong
theStrokes
A Conversation with Bertrand Russell (1952)
zeppomarx
by  zeppomarx
Why does good usually win in the long run!
mat ha
by  mat ha
Donna Haraway. Companion Species Manifesto Lecture 2003 1/10
yungLb
by  yungLb
Affirmative Action is Simply Less Wrong
caringv
by  caringv
the right to work with whoever you chose
At what point do our actions become inconsequential in the grand scheme of things?
24601
by  24601
the will to do anything vs the will to sacrifice anything
bigg topics