All good advice.

Very true on the mixing/bulking up with RsO on here eggsta24

Needs to be made exactly how it's taught. Isopropyl and a rice cooker.

I cant vouch for Myconauts product but it would be my pleasure to send you a sample of my oil

Its 60%LH²P / 40%Red Red if I remember correctly. Really strong and pure, full spectrum oil.
I could dose you up a weeks worth to start you off

Sorry for your diagnosis mate.

Maybe research RSO, Rick Simpson Oil.

But it will make you stoned and high, not so much if you have it before bed. It would increase your appetite greatly.

KiG

Really sorry to hear that,
As eggsta24 mentioned, I have some FECO blend drops (full extract cannabis oil), full spectrum made with equal amounts of THC & CBD, you can find them here - https://littlebiggy.net/link/jvBIbd

A friend of mine recovering from chemo used them to help with appetite loss & sickness.

Also advisable to try a pure RSO (my drops are mixed with MCT oil).

From my research, CBD can also be of benefit when dealing with cancer, but please do your own research too - I'm not medically trained & would hate to give the wrong advice.

Good luck

Your diagnosis sucks my friend . I've been tempted to make Feco for a while now - for medical use like yours. but had little interest. Look it up ( full extract cannabis oil ) hmu if interested .

Sorry to hear spacedhopper mate,Don’t let the bastard grind you down brother 👊🏻
As mentioned RSO is the main form that is associated with pain relief and appetite for cancer but will give you the high.
Make sure to take zinc b complex vitamins and omega 3 they are suggested to increase appetite naturally ( I have chronic gastric issues and they seemed to have improved my appetite after time)
Hope you find something to help get that hunger back my man

i don't celebrate anyone's murder, and this escalation of political violence is really concerning to me.

but - what is it that you're all mourning about charlie kirk? i'm sure he was a nice guy when he was in his pyjamas, but publicly he seemed like a toxic and intolerant person, wilfully spreading lies and misinformation and encouraging the dire political situation they have now in the US.

or am i missing something?

Totally agree with this, feel terrible for his family especially his children, no child should lose their father in such a horrific manner. However stirring conflict while being unashamedly bigoted and pushing a pro gun agenda is inevitably risky and incredibly irresponsible. There are consequences to endlessly stirring the pot for personal gain.

He also preached that he wouldn't allow his daughter an abortion even if she had been raped...

unfortunately not a niche opinion in magaland.

It's not the baby's fault.

So does a woman have any rights over her own body?

you are right he was a POS

No.

What lies and misinformation exactly?

a few examples . . . .

https://www.commonsensemedia.org/website-reviews/politifact/user-reviews/adult

The fact that it cites the news as sources for fact checking tells me all I need to know.

actually mostly it's referencing his own twitter feed.

Still, saying his opinions are wrong because the news says so is not very credible. Sure he's said some BS, like every other person on this planet.
If wanting to conserve sovereignty, freedom, secularism and family values is so wrong, who in their right mind wants to be right?
He died for what he believed in which is way more than anyone here will ever do, so get off your high horse with the finger pointing like he's not worthy of mourning because you disagree with him.
I'm more interested in the things he said during the last couple of days before his assassination, like during his interview with Ben Shapiro, and him now conveniently taking over his non-profit organisation.

How was he protecting secularism when he preached there should be no seperation between church and state?

"There is no separation of church and state, it’s a fabrication. It’s a fiction. It’s not in the Constitution. It’s made up by secular humanists." In his own words. Not very secular.

"In a 2018 interview with the Rubin Report, he argued that politics should be advanced through a secular worldview and there should be a separation of church and state. He said the imposition of a Christian version of morality through government policy, was wrong"

Yes but he revised that viewpoint. That is why he made the comment I quoted in 2022 on his own podcast.

I wasn't aware he changed his mind on that subject, my apologies.
However, without delving too far into conspiracy theories, it seems many funders of TPUSA appear to support forms of political and legal work that weaken or reinterpret traditional notions of strict church-state separation, especially where they believe certain Christian values should inform public policy, or where religious institutions should receive public support.
Even so, I fail to see how he's said anything to warrant getting shot in the neck in front of his family as well as many others.
It's disgusting how so many here are keen to piss on his memory for disagreeing with him. I thought we were better than this, but apparently not.

actually i think i was pretty clear from the outset that i was never going to celebrate someone getting murdered. and i never said he had it coming.

i just didn't understand why he seemed to be held up as some kind of hero, when he seemed to be a person that was invested in societal division. that seemed to be a strange kind of hero to me.

and, as i already said, much of what is reported came straight from his own twitter feed. not sure why that's contentious to then be relaying here.

i actually think the LB community is, in general, a place of great compassion. some of us are perhaps a little more wary than others of celebrating the life of someone who seemed to be invested in creating division and amplifying hatred.

anyhoo, i'm not here to get into a pointless argument. ciao for now :-)

Didn't know we were arguing.
There's not a huge difference between celebrating someone's murder and jumping at the opportunity to voice your negative opinions and questioning people's justification to mourn a person in a thread about mourning said person. Maybe people's wishes for society differ from your own and he gave a voice to many such opinions, good and bad? There's a time and a place, and you had to butt in here to spew negativity as if it adds good to the world. You're coming off as self-righteous and intolerant - exactly how you portray what you're criticising. It's obviously contentious to relay that in a thread titled RIP Charlie Kirk, and I think you understand that perfect well.
He did many heroic things, especially the one that got him killed - wether he's a hero or not though is entirely subjective, so serve little purpose in this discussion.
I couldn't care less about the left/right drama, I just want peace, quiet and prosperity for all. He gave everyone who wanted to speak a platform to do that, that is heroic, especially when mass media is doing the exact opposite. He had some controversial opinions sure, but that doesn’t mean he's not worthy of mourning. In addition, this is an attack on free speech, not just Charlie Kirk - and in a sense he was martyred for us all to remember the thin thread we're walking in today's society, for we may all get shot in the neck for simply speaking, metaphorically as well.
If you're not up for debate then why reply at all?

aahhh of course, now the personal attacks begin.

this is why there's no point in continuing this convo. that's not a debate, that's you trying to demean me.

i never said i wasn't up for debate, i said i wasn't up for argument. your tone was aggressive from the start, and you've shown yourself now as someone who actually just wants to squash me, rather than debate.

my initial question about whether i was missing something wasn't disingenous, it was an honest one. but so far no-one has offered anything other than - oh he was actually really great, or, the news sources i'm reading are wrong (seemingly compared to the other ones that must be entirely correct).

'debating' people doesn't give you carte blanche to be rude. it just makes you rude, and your language becomes weaponised. that doesn't sound like someone who wants peace for all (unless that doesn't include me).

if you want a debate, then keep it civil.

I'm pointing out your hypocrisy. If you find it demeaning then don't throw stones in a glass house? You're pissing on someone's grave while being too sensitive to be criticised for it?
I've informed you of what you were missing, but you're being dismissing because you can't deal with being wrong.
He died defending freedom, is that not heroism to you? It's the objective definition of the word. Facts are facts - your feelings are not. You can't claim to want debate and to be exempt from criticism at the same time, what is this?
And yes, I want peace for you, as well as all the other people I disagree with.
I will never give you anything but words, and if you don't want them, don't engage.

it's amazing how often people here refer to 'facts', as if that somehow ends every debate. it's only your opinion that he died defending freedom. he died, that's the only fact here that can't be debated or considered.

I've asked an honest question about why he's so highly thought of here, and so far no-one has been able to say why.

How is he toxic? That's idiotic. He spoke nothing but common sense and they assassinated him for it you prick. Two kids and a wife.

Fuck guns, one love. He died living by his own sword.

There was a US school shoot up on the same day that only made local news whilst this reverberates across global media and probably for months to come. Something doesn't feel right...

I think Americans have become somewhat inured to school shootings. they're a fact of life there now (39 people killed or injured so far this year). political assassinations are still rare so I guess more 'newsworthy'.

some are saying the real shooter was near in the crowd, in white t shirt, with a smartphone 🔫.
which is silenced and can be aimed off the screen, you see it in the video, in one its pretty clear.
the patsy shot i imagine but was only used as cover.
a few were there all part of it, a decoy or two.
was highly organized, even a drone zoomed by at time.
our eyes witnessed something akin t0 911 when the towers, steel beams and all were turned to ash.
something wizard like.
also Charlie was more a civil rights person than a right wing activist imo.
a true gentle spirit, which is why we feel the pain from our Souls too.
take care of yourself my friend.❤️

such a gentle spirit, stirring up hatred for a living.

Watch his debates. You might learn something.

Stay strong my brothers and sisters ❤️

rest in piss more like. un-christian hateful little piece of scum. proof you just have to claim you're a believer and people will accept it and back you uncritically.

Yes this is an important thing to understand. People are interested in their own lives and a crazy ruler is just a form of entertainment in most people's lives. If they are effective with delivering quick economic results then they are good entertainers and are delivering some positives then fine - so why think more about this? It's demeaning to even take a fascist seriously so why bother doing so? In Germany we know why.

It is worrying that the far right parties are gaining to much support in Europe, and we should never take our eye off the ball and learn from history what can happen when you do...

You speak like leftism is the only legitimate political ideology.

Hate to be the bearer of bad news but there is no left what we have are a bunch of globalists run by the rich (WEF) pretending to be left(the right aint much better) while sending lots of our tax payers cash and weapons to a bunch of nazi`s who took over Ukraine in a coup financed by the US who by the way also funded the 3rd Reich and only joined the fight in Europe when it looked like their little puppet the mad Austrian was going to get his butt kicked and Germany occupied by the Red Army.
Their plan is sinister it is to send all you youngsters to die in battle so they dont end up with a pension crisis after stealing all the pension monies.
Yes the 3rd great human cull has already started.

the nature of misinformation is to use real facts and riff bullshit forward. that's sad in this case because there are some valid points that can be drawn from the cupla truths you have here.

What far right parties are you talking about ?
Judging by that picture , you've bought the Globalist lie that anyone who opposes the WEF is far right .
Far right usually means racist . I don't know of any racist parties that are on the rise in Europe . The right that is rising in Europe is generally speaking conservative of the liberal culture we've established over the last few decades . The new right believes in womens rights , gay rights , etc . You seem to be stuck in the past . The left are fighting phantoms and calling anyone who disagrees with them Nazis because they've run out of actual racists to fight .
It's actually very offensive to the people who did suffer under the Nazis .

Sadly we going to be finding out very soon that the majority of Americans want a semi-Fascist state the same with the uk population too

You better be talking about the authoritarian left but I fear you are not .
The right are all about freedom .

ring really reminds me of the gestapo, they rolled almost exclusively through ordinary informants. people with fucked up biases are having their day.

The 1st thing Goebels did was put a device in everyone's home.

why do they keep designing things to look like hal? doesnt anyone remember how the movie ends?

I usually pass out way before the end

not to worry its the worst part

where there are informants there is vendetta, blackmail and corruption

Any smart device

Why the dystopian views are always referred to Nazism and not to Communism? They are basically the same shit, and Communism looks much more dangerous to me, because it "succeeded" for many more years, in many more countries, and for some reason has that glamorous look to so many idiots...

Germany became increasingly polarized with people espousing Marxism on one side and Law and Order on the other. This is exactly how it feels in America now.

LOL very interesting take on history there

? pretty much the mainstream view on this for germany as well as austria and italy

AND JUST LIKE IN NAZI GERMANY YOU HAVE PEOPLE BEING APOLOGISTS BECAUSE OF "COMMUNISM". AT LEAST IT WAS ACTUALLY FUCKING COMMUNISM BACK THEN AND NOT JUST WHATEVER IS NOT ON THE RIGHT

and fucking communism works wonders for the ugly

from each according to his sperm

In times of economic and political strife extremists always rise, whether left or right wing...it doesn't matter, they are reactionary's. For example the liberal left intend destruction of things about history that upset them much in the same way Nazi's in Germany burned books. People need to learn from History and rarely do, the same mistakes are repeated and things somehow trundle on. 'Good times bring weak people', 'Weak people bring bad times', 'Bad times bring strong people' & 'Strong people bring good times'. The great circle of human history.

I thought it was the republicans (ie the right) in America banning certain aspects of history they don’t like.

Who are the liberal left?

Edit
I’m not trying to start an argument I’m trying to understand

lol it's different in different countries. A conservative in the US is different from a conservative in the UK.

As an example the BLM movement (btw I support equal rights for all races, genders etc.) have tried to expunge slavery and that part of history. Taking down statues of former slaveholders and so on won't change anything, we must remember these things happened so that they don't happen again.

Because of slow or no change for certain groups there is an attempt to accelerate that change from an evolution to a revolution. People will only be backed into a corner for so long whatever their political inclinations. Some people think they're pushing for positive change but real change is when we've learned the lesson.

an act of desecration is often more a monument of history than the original statue

Thanks for the response mate.

I still don’t get the tearing down statues of slave owners equates to trying to erase the history. Statues aren’t history they glorify the subjects for posterity.

Is it still a massive issue over there around the teaching of CRT?

Well the statues are an example. They are subjects for posterity but they also memorialise history and certain points in history. As such they connect themselves to that history.

I basically agree with you though, they aren't the history themselves and so it shouldn't matter. It's what they represent that makes the difference.

I feel that whether right or left wing, people have an agenda and push that. Both different sides of the same coin I'd say.

Also CRT?

Thanks for the response mate.

I see statues as a way to venerate the individual and what they stand for. Cultures generally don’t put up statues of twats. So the slavers statues should all come down imo.

CRT
Critical Race Theory

Yeah np, I don't mind a bit of debate.

Again I do agree with the first part of what you said. Statues certainly venerate people, but also events. However cultures not putting up statues of 'twats'...well...that's a matter of perspective.

There are many examples of people that put up statues of people who are considered great or influential in their time and place. Those same people and statues are considered later, or by another group to be somehow offensive or detestable.

I'm not gona say that something like slavery in the U.S. wasn't a terrible thing, it defo was. I do think that removing something that is generally offensive to the majority should be considered. It's just that we also need to learn from these things and replace them with something that educates people about the history surrounding them so as to understand the bigger picture.

But yeah CRT, I am familiar with it...bit of a deep and complicated topic. But to answer your original question about that, yes I believe it is still something of a hot topic within education in the UK. I believe the Tories here (conservatives) said they felt CRT was biased, in other words trying to ram anti-racism down kids throats without opposing viewpoints.

This is a quote from the Equalities Minister, "Any school which teaches these elements of critical race theory, or which promotes partisan political views such as defunding the police without offering a balanced treatment of opposing views, is breaking the law".

So yeah interesting, jeez this turned into an essay XD

Thanks man I do appreciate your time and input.

It’s good to hear it from someone on the ground so to speak we just get fed what the media want us to hear

I do find CRT and the defund the police movements different. One is a collection of scholars etc critically evaluating how society has impacted people of all races and the defund the police is a social movement in response to innocent black people getting killed by police

Have I got that right?

You sound very naïve & to support CRT is crazy, hope you don't spout the sort of nonsense politics we see above IRL.

I don’t know how supporting a data driven legal critical evaluation by experts as naive maybe I’m missing something in your post as it doesn’t really make sense and yes i do discuss this topic and others with real people

Everything you've been hearing about the right is a lie .

Watching the Plot Against America on Sky and it’s easy to see how Facism takes hold. Not dissimilar to Trump’s America.

How is Trump's America fascist ?

Trump's lot are literally following the nazi playbook.

this old post is aging disturbingly well

These days everything should be used with a VPN there are way too many foul creatures that see opportunity in your data.

Thanks hotplay, any good recommendations would be welcome

Private Internet Access is a good bunch, they took out a big ad in the Times to shame the greedy US Senate.

thanks, started using opera which has a built in VPN as mentioned by the geezer above. Working a treat

Yeah they kind of creep me out, the images on their site seem subtly referential to kiddie porn, plus they are in the states which is a shit jurisdiction. I would say expressvpn.com, a little harder to use but a good outfit.

nice one, thank u

last time I asked this everyone laughed at me.. made it seem like VPN's are useless and I was overracting, fuck it I still use one though. Funny how you get mixed opinions on one post compared to the other.

They are actually pretty useless especially western based vpns(as we are much more free the company’s don’t need to give the same level of protection compared to one being used in a Asian country, if you read the t&cs ur data is not as secure as you would first think also your data can be sold on which is then not protected almost all vpns do this.

You can try. I have Private Internet Access and I can't visit the site unless my VPN is turned off.

I have PIA and I can access, I'm accessing LB on TOR browser and setting PIA to DE Berlin server

TOR is the answer to this for now. Even with Java partially enabled to get LB to work.

VPN is just another potential target for man in the middle attack.

Tor is safer if u use the safest option u just need to figure out what to press lol :)

https://torrentfreak.com/best-vpn-anonymous-no-logging/

😉

sharing
reference tokens are used when sharing links to content on this site

This happened to me last week. It turns out Royal Mail are back to requiring signatures for some parcels to be able to deliver them. I just ordered a redelivery via their website and it arrived without issues, signature required.

Yeah, same as Anon1385 I had a signature requested last week after months of RM just dropping the parcels without them. I guess we're officially not doing Covid rules any more. Anyway, I ordered a reship and it arrived the next day, but as others have said, I doubt you've got anything to worry about if you would prefer to pick it up from the sorting office.

Unless it's a bit stinky?😋
That being said i've a new vendors order arriving tomorrow, better be ready for it.

Northern Organics stealth is great but they also use letterbox boxes so a bit weird you didn’t get it 🤔…

too much. I like distillates to ingest orally while puffing on a cart so about 1 cart/10 days + 1 syringe/week = $120/week, give or take

throw in a few edibles & Green Dragon (made myself) on Saturday night date night with the wife

I'm a pretty heavy stoner, but keep my costs down by relying mostly on concentrates. I tend to get Canadian dispensary products which work out 30-40 quid per gram. At a push, using efficient kit (Puffco Peak/Dab rig) I can make 1 gram last a week. But typically, I'll get through 2g of concentrates a week, along with a henry or so of bud and a couple of grams of hash. I guess I'm spending about 100 a week, but I'm OK with that.

How many dabs do you get out a gram? If I made the full switch to concentrates I doubt I'd need very much at all. 100 is a decent amount of smoke for sure I would be happy with that too.

I don't think I've ever counted really... I've usually got 4 or 5 different waxes/shatters on the go at once, so it's hard to tell. Got to be at least 20 dabs from 1g (for me)... I just tried to weigh the piece of shatter I'm about to dab, the scales read 0.00! I once attempted a 0.25g dab (which is still small compared to some... possibly?) but pretty much coughed it all out straight away. I like to hold them down for a good 30 seconds...

Interesting idea mate