ChromeBerreta

3 topics on ChromeBerreta

2 posts

+2 votes

by ChromeBerreta

Hash Rosin disposables

3 posts

+3 votes

by ChromeBerreta

Where’s SayNo2Drugs?

1 post

+1 votes

by ChromeBerreta

Any vendor getting nice extracts in soon, home-made or imports I don’t mind.

1 post by ChromeBerreta

1 post

+4 votes

on {littlebiggy initiatives}

INITIATIVE: 10/10 voting

What I do to satisfy both the future buyers and vendors is to just give them a 10/10 but give a longer and more thorough review with good and bads abo…

on {littlebiggy initiatives}

INITIATIVE: 10/10 voting

The current culture of giving, sometimes being directly requested to, and the inference that the only option is to give 10/10 is not useful.

If vendors only want 10/10 then there is no difference between qualities of products.

Yeah, there’s a correlation between price and rating, and 10/10 for £50 bud is not the same as 10/10 for £100 but it’s not really useful as a metric at this point and makes it difficult to make informed decisions.

This is further exacerbated by vendors requesting 10/10, and the fact that if you don’t give that you might be barred from ordering from them.

So what’s the fix? More granular rating system maybe, where product is divorced from comms/vendor/p&p etc.

fateharder

this one needs a lot of work, and a lot of thought given. there's a lot of sociology/psychology to consider i guess? definitely wont be a simple fix. but i 100 % agree this is in serious need of resolution. the rating system is busted as is

her9o874

"More granular rating system maybe..."

I would go in the other direction: fewer, but more definitive options.

So "Would you buy this product again?" and "Would you buy from this vendor again?".

And the "days to arrive" metric isn't much use without knowing what service was used and who paid for it.

You'd think that some metrics could be automated by pulling them from LB: eg orders not sent within four days are automatically cancelled.

But yes, the 10/10 system isn't very useful, as it's entirely subjective with no consistency between users and open to manipulation.

Elysiumwanderer

I’ve seen a vendor openly complain about a 9/10 rating that seemed justified. Like you’ve suggested, if the rating could be split between services, like service - stealth - value - quality

That way you could rate for each and the overall vendor rating isn’t tarnished if people honestly rate the quality.

I’ve been fairly disappointed with apparently 10/10 smokes this year and agree the reviews are basically useless