A "no trust" system, often referred to as a "zero trust" system in the context of cybersecurity, operates on the principle of "never trust, always verify."¹ This approach assumes that there are potential threats both outside and inside the network, so no user or device is trusted by default. Instead, every access request is thoroughly verified before granting the minimum necessary privileges.

For such a system to work over an extended period like 1000 years, several key factors would need to be in place:

1. **Adaptive and Evolving Policies**: The system must have the ability to adapt to new threats and technologies over time. This would likely involve machine learning algorithms that can evolve without human intervention.
2. **Decentralization**: To avoid single points of failure, the system should be decentralized, with decision-making processes distributed across multiple nodes.
3. **Sustainability**: The system's infrastructure would need to be sustainable, with mechanisms for self-repair and maintenance.
4. **Continuous Verification**: Ongoing and real-time verification of credentials and access rights would be essential to maintain security.
5. **Immutable Audit Trails**: Keeping secure, unalterable logs would help in tracking and analyzing access patterns and potential security breaches.

Implementing such a system would be a complex endeavor, requiring foresight into technological advancements and societal changes over the millennium. It would also need to balance security with usability to ensure that it remains practical for the users it serves.

thirdweb is a complete web3 development framework that provides everything you need to connect your apps and games to decentralized networks.

There's a lot of smart people that bet a de-centralised world fucks this one up. It's proven for finance but that's just the bottom shelf. It threatens corporate presidents as much as national ones, that's its nature.

Like anything else there's a lot of healthy criticism. The start of every boom is littered with despicable excess but few tech waves hold the potential of changing the existing power structures like this, an existentially post-national world.

So expect crucifixion before web 3 crosses the finish line.

This a16z web3 podcast establishes differences between the legacy worlds and the experiential economy of a metaverse.

TLDR
it aint a metaverse
if you can only consume
if it simply has vr graphics
if there is a linear narrative

it is a metaverse
if there is interoperability amongst worlds
if property is owned immutably
if history is accessible to all
if the value of meaning can be exchanged

Seems a good thing for little biggy: The high-level goal for UniRep is to be a base layer on top of which anyone can easily build custom, yet interoperable, reputation systems, For instance, users could create combined zero-knowledge proofs of reputation across different social media platforms, consumer apps, or financial applications, in order to provide holistic, private, and trustworthy information about themselves to others.

just finished a blockchain project using moralis and it was a big help

George Gilder is like a zillion years old now but he's been right about every technology wave since the late 1980s. He is sure that FANG is fucked and blockchain is blessed.